• 00:00    |    
    Initial credits
  • 00:06    |    
    Introduction: Two types of legal regulation
    • Government regulation and control - The Market Failure Argument
    • Negative externalities
    • Law and regulation as a remedy
    • Tort law
    • Relationship between law and market
  • 05:40    |    
    Common law
    • Customary law and human interaction
    • Common law of England
    • The evolution process of common law
    • Friedrich August von Hayek on the growth of law and the spontaneous order
    • Quote, n , William Blackstone (1765)
    • Adam Ferguson (Ferguson of Raith) on the common law
    • Tort law and the imposition of harm
    • Definition of injunction
    • Tort law as an example of a evolutionary and spontaneous law
    • Assault and battery
    • Basic human psychology and the assaults of dignity
    • Common law as libertarian legal system
  • 19:17    |    
    • Expertise as argument for legislation of law
    • Public choice economics
    • George John Mitchell and integrity
    • Particular interests and the common good
    • Legislation and the favor of the politically dominant group
    • Freedom and regulation
    • Civil liability as a regulatory mechanism
  • 26:30    |    
    Free market
    • Meaning and form of action
    • Relationship between law and market
    • Common law as the overlapping of law and market
    • Revision of the Market Failure Argument
    • Purpose of Tort law as a regulating agency
    • Argument in the limit of regulation
    • Government regulation and its comparative assessment
    • Civil liability system and the risk of activity
    • Oil pollution act of 1990 and the limits of liability
    • Capture of the regulatory agency
    • Comparing civil liability and legislation
    • Hasnas's rule
    • Civil liability and special interest advocacy
  • 41:00    |    
    Questions and comments section
  • Is common law a form of government intervention or regulation?
  • 42:38    |    
    Final credits

Two Types of Legal Regulation: Evolution vs. Central Planning

New Media  | 15 de octubre de 2013  | Vistas: 4

Hasnas delivers his ideas on the Market Failure Argument from an innovative perspective to law students at UFM. In his view, there exist two different types of legal regulation: that which has evolved in markets over years as a form of common law, and legislation, dictated and centrally planned by government to protect certain interests. Hayekian law, he argues, is truly libertarian: it allows for the greatest amount of freedom while preventing individuals from damaging each other. Legislation, on the other hand, typically serves the interest of the politically dominant group, often times at the expense of the public good.

There is a misconception in the belief that the free market is completely unregulated. In the real world, human beings are never free from some form of regulation. In the case of the market, voluntary transactions are regulated by ethical and religious beliefs, and by civil liability, even in the absence of legislation. The latter serves as a strong, built-in regulatory mechanism that has evolved within the market, and that is often stronger than any form of legislative measure. This disproves the Market Failure Argument. It also reveals that the law and the market aren’t completely separate realms: they overlap at the existence of common law.

According to Hasnas, the debate lies on whether the market really needs regulation and what type would be appropriate. The answer is evident when comparing the two forms of legal regulation, he affirms. It is clear which is truly stronger in preventing dangerous market activity.


John Hasnas is author of the book Trapped: When Acting Ethically…


Nuestra misión es la enseñanza y difusión de los principios éticos, jurídicos y económicos de una sociedad de personas libres y responsables.

Universidad Francisco Marroquín