Doing Liberty Differently: Towards Libertarian Activism

Silvana Quispetupa  | 21 de noviembre de 2022  | Vistas: 30

The Universidad Francisco Marroquín (UFM) has Christopher Lingle, economist and visiting professor, as a guest. Christopher Lingle in his speech addresses the paradox of a resource-rich country grappling with poverty and asserts that UFM was established to combat this issue by advocating for personal freedom and self-determination.

Human liberty and personal dignity are essential for a dignified life so that we can share in prosperity." — Christopher Lingle

Lingle analyzes the economic principle of scarcity, noting it as a fundamental challenge in human existence. Scarcity, especially the limited nature of time, drives human actions and interactions, leading to the creation of social orders. He critiques socialism, arguing that it undermines human values and liberty, thus harming livelihoods. Lingle calls for more effective communication of UFM’s ideas to counter the appeal of socialism among the younger generation.

Then, Lingle talks about markets, driven by self-interest, lead to mutual benefits through voluntary exchanges and he contrasts market competition, which results in mutual gains, with zero-sum sports competitions. Also, Lingle argues that economic, civic, and political liberties are intertwined and essential for a free and prosperous society. 

True moral actions must stem from personal choice, not from legal obligation." — Christopher Lingle

Addressing criticisms of UFM’s focus on capitalism and economic freedom, Lingle clarifies that capitalism supports private property rights and individual liberty rather than prescribing a specific ideology. Private property rights are fundamental to human freedom and self-actualization, Lingle argues. Without secure property rights, individuals are effectively enslaved, as their labor and its fruits can be confiscated.

Lingle calls for activism among students, urging them to defend human liberty and property rights. He suggests practical steps such as promoting freedom of speech, opposing occupational licensing, and identifying injustices in regulation. Defending economic freedom should be rooted in moral arguments, emphasizing the overall improvement in human welfare.

A powerful message, delivered well, can reshape perspectives and challenge preconceived notions." — Christopher Lingle

To conclude, Christopher addresses the sense of guilt some young people feel due to perceived privileges, encouraging them to channel their activism towards promoting freedom. True moral actions must be voluntary, Lingle argues, not compelled by legal or political forces. And he emphasizes the importance of respecting others' autonomy, allowing individuals to find their own paths to happiness and prosperity.